Re: Whitebox Linux

[Tarjei Knapstad <tarjeik chemcon no>]

On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 16:10, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 13 Jan 2004 16:00:19 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad <tarjeik chemcon no> wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 14:08, David C. Hart wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 07:30, Mark wrote:
> >> > Yes and currently testing it.  Seems like a good distro so far. 
> >> > 
> >> > On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 06:16, WipeOut wrote:
> >> > > Has anyone taken a look at www.whiteboxlinux.org ??
> >> > > 
> >> > > Its basically RHEL 3 recompiled from the src.rpms. No price, No restrictions..
> >> > > 
> >> Fedora looks more current. Is there anything in WB that is not in FC1?
> >
> >That's not the point. WhiteBox is a rebuild of the RHEL3 distro and has
> >nothing to do with Fedora (except the fact that RHEL3 is based off FC1).
> >WhiteBox is a free alternative for your servers, not an alternative to
> >Fedora.
> >
> 
> How about typing "/sbin/service"?

Errr..what's that got to do with anything? Are you trolling?

--
Tarjei