Repost :umount: /initrd: not mounted

Y. Makki bugzilla at sympatico.ca
Mon Jan 19 03:32:08 UTC 2004


I guess it's appropriate to repost my grub.conf:
#boot=/dev/hda
default=0
timeout=10
splashimage=(hd0,1)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
title Fedora Core (2.4.22-1.2149.nptl)
        root (hd0,1)
        kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.22-1.2149.nptl ro root=LABEL=/ hdd=ide-scsi
rhgb
        initrd /initrd-2.4.22-1.2149.nptl.img
title Windows XP
        rootnoverify (hd0,0)
        chainloader +1

and fdisk -l:

# fdisk -l
 
Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40020664320 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4865 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
 
   Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *         1      2433  19543041    7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda2          2434      2446    104422+  83  Linux
/dev/hda3          2447      4735  18386392+  83  Linux
/dev/hda4          4736      4865   1044225    f  Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5          4736      4865   1044193+  82  Linux swap
 
Disk /dev/hdb: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
 
   Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hdb1   *         1      9729  78148161    c  Win95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/hdb2          9730     19457  78140160    f  Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hdb5          9730     19457  78140128+   b  Win95 FAT32

I'm yet to try removing 'rhgb' from grub.conf and seeing if the messages
go away on bootup.


On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 21:59, David Jackson wrote:
> > Am So, den 18.01.2004 schrieb David Jackson um 23:02:
> >> This was posted a day or so ago, and I've run out of question and
> >> answers
> >> for poster.
> >>
> >> Any ideas the systems thinks /initrd is mount? His /etc/fstab didn't
> >> have
> >> it defined?
> >>
> >>
> >> David
> >
> > /initrd exists? chowned by root.root and chmod 755.
> And it's mounted at boot time? I don't see it being mounted on my system?
> If the /boot partion isn't the first one do you have to set (grub.conf):
> boot = /dev/hdaX to the correct parition?
> 
> Thanks for you reply.
> 
> David





More information about the fedora-list mailing list