FC1 on the enterprise?

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 16:49, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> And finally, have you considered that Red Hat could cease providing public 
> SRPMS or even public source for RHEL at any time if they feel that their 
> income stream is threatened by WBEL or other alternatives? Then how are you 
> going to get updates? Are they going to patch, test, QA, and replicate all 
> that software themselves?

*cof* For most software in RHEL I don't think they could really do that
legally (GPL and Lesser GPL software)

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040119/f9e36ba9/attachment-0001.sig>