[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Is there anything cheaper than VMWare that runs Win2k?
- From: Preston Crawford <me prestoncrawford com>
- To: Fedora <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Is there anything cheaper than VMWare that runs Win2k?
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:22:55 -0800
This talk about adding Win2k lately has me thinking. I really hate
dual-booting. Mostly because I hate leaving Linux since that's where my
mail/irc/mp3s, etc. are. So I was wondering. Is there a virtualization
package out there (that works relatively well) that's cheaper than
VMWare and still runs Win2k. I ask that because I'm trying to get a
platform to run ASP.NET on (I'm using Mono currently, but it has issues)
and as far as I know I need at least Win2k for that. Last time I checked
Win4Lin only supported up to Windows ME. What else is there that works?
Preston
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]