Re: Swap size (was: Disk Layout/Partitioning Practices)

["T. Ribbrock" <emgaron gmx net>]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 11:37:47AM -0500, Kent Borg wrote:

[swap for 2.4.x = 2xRAM?]

> That was only true for a short time in the early 2.4s, something about
> the kernel wanting to collect stuff on speculation up to that level.
> The VM has changed a lot since then.

Ah! Well, that's enlightening, thanks!

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
===> Netiquette - read it, use it: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html <===
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Thomas Ribbrock    http://www.ribbrock.org 
  "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"