[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Spamassassin timing
- From: "Scot L. Harris" <webid cfl rr com>
- To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Spamassassin timing
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:20:02 -0400
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 03:16, Thomas Bitschnau wrote:
> Ok, I took a closer look and the information provided by me, was not
> correct.
>
> There is a difference between DNS and DNS::NBL.
>
> We are talking about DNS-lookups, I described DNS::NBL-lookups.
>
> DNS-lookups uses DNS-banlists, which are checked with every tested mail
> and this takes some time. I think this is, what takes so long on some
> systems.
>
> PS: I hope this is it now! :-)
>
> Greetings,
Could the systems having a long delay have an issue with IPv6? Have
seen a number issues with DNS lookups that appear to be resolved if IPv6
is either configured correctly or disabled completely.
Just a thought.
Have been using spamassassin for well over a year and it has been
great. Highly recommended. And if anyone is operating a full blown
email server I highly recommend checking out greylisting. This has
reduced spam at my site from 3000 to 6000 spam messages a day to 6 or 8
spam messages. And those get trapped by spamassassin.
--
Scot L. Harris
webid cfl rr com
Economists can certainly disappoint you. One said that the economy would
turn up by the last quarter. Well, I'm down to mine and it hasn't.
-- Robert Orben
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]