FC1 stable, FC2 ... you wish.
akonstam at trinity.edu
akonstam at trinity.edu
Mon Jun 7 14:35:16 UTC 2004
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 10:53:35PM -0300, Patrick Boutilier wrote:
>
>
> Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> >
> > Okay, so after a whole week of fighting FC2 to run, and having to
> >reboot the machine every 4 to 5 hours because of a kernel panic, I
> >downgraded to FC1 and low and behold...the server's running without a
> >single hitch. So, something's screwed with FC2 which causes it to panic
> >with either the pdflush or the swapper processes, whereas none of the
> >previous RH versions, nor FC1 have that problem. It also trashed a 200
> >GB drive every time it panicked. None of the previous versions of RH
> >did that.
> >
> > And with everything else I have read on this list over the past two
> >weeks or so, I'd say stay away from FC2. Maybe it's time I start
> >looking at a different distribution...
>
> Do as you please but I haven't had a single problem with FC2 .
>
It is also true with every distribution there are hardware
configurations they will not work on. It is a mystery.
--
-------------------------------------------
Aaron Konstam
Computer Science
Trinity University
One Trinity Place.
San Antonio, TX 78212-7200
telephone: (210)-999-7484
email:akonstam at trinity.edu
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list