[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Promise RAID-1 vs software RAID-1
- From: Christopher Chan <cchan outblaze com>
- To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Promise RAID-1 vs software RAID-1
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:22:06 +0800
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 10:39 6/16/2004, Alan Horn wrote:
Raid 1 is mirroring only. For data integrity reasons I can't see how
they could read from any but the master mirror.
WAG alert:
Once the two disks are synchronized, it sounds perfectly reasonable to
writes to take the same amount of time (since all data has to be written
to both drives), but for reads to be significantly faster by reading
from both spindles. There really is no "master" in an equal set of two,
I think. Both contain identical data, so you should be able to read from
both. I think.
The Linux kernel does give you the ability to read simultaneously from
both drives in a Linux mirror array.
By the way, the Promise cards *are* software RAID... all the real RAID
computations are done by the driver using the computer's resources. The
trick is that the binary driver for Linux is probably less mature and
less flexible than Linux native software RAID, so I've always used
Promise and HighPoint controllers simply as additional EIDE/ATA
controllers and used Linux software RAID. Excellent results. Note that
Linux software RAID is also capable of RAID-5, IIRC, which the Promise
drivers are not.
Heh, exactly the same reason here. Any Promise installation we had was
for ATA100 support.
If you have the budget, I'd strongly recommend the 3Ware cards. Real
hardware RAID, native Linux kernel support since 2.2.x, fast, very
reliable, and not expensive.
Some gotchas:
3ware RAID 5 sucks and especially when in degraded mode (and this goes
for a lot of other hardware RAID cards) because the onboard processor is
not fast enough to handle the calculations. Hint: If you see an Intel
960 processor on your RAID board, forget RAID 5.
Linux RAID 5 will be much faster so forget the 3ware RAID card if you
want to do RAID 5.
3ware RAID 1+0 also sucks. You are better off configuring two mirrors
and using the Linux kernel to achieve the RAID 0 part. This means that,
depending on what you got (4 port/8 port/12 port), you will need other
disks on the IDE channels for the system if there is nothing left for
the system.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]