stability of fedora for server application?

shane c branch scbranch at barton.edu
Sat Mar 13 18:24:37 UTC 2004


WipeOut wrote:

> Shockwave wrote:
> 
>>Overall I have to say I have been extremely satisfied with the
>>performance and reliability of both RHEL and FC.  I suppose the only
>>possible down-side I see with FC is that there may not be an easy
>>upgrade path from FC1 to FC2.  I'm still waiting to see what happens. 
>>If there isn't a way to easily upgrade it means I have to take a couple
>>of highly used servers offline for a time and install FC2 to get all the
>>new goodies.  Regardless, I think that the value far outweighs the
>>inconvenience in my situation.
>>
>>  
>>
> I was under the impression that there would be an upgrade path available 
> from FC1 to FC2.. Is this not the case??
> 
> What are specific issues that standout as problem in trying to upgrade 
> from FC1 to FC2?
> 
> Later..
> 
> 
I'd be interested to know the same. It also brings up another question: 
start with FC1 or FC2?

-- 
regards,

shane





More information about the fedora-list mailing list