stability of fedora for server application?
shane c branch
scbranch at barton.edu
Sat Mar 13 18:24:37 UTC 2004
WipeOut wrote:
> Shockwave wrote:
>
>>Overall I have to say I have been extremely satisfied with the
>>performance and reliability of both RHEL and FC. I suppose the only
>>possible down-side I see with FC is that there may not be an easy
>>upgrade path from FC1 to FC2. I'm still waiting to see what happens.
>>If there isn't a way to easily upgrade it means I have to take a couple
>>of highly used servers offline for a time and install FC2 to get all the
>>new goodies. Regardless, I think that the value far outweighs the
>>inconvenience in my situation.
>>
>>
>>
> I was under the impression that there would be an upgrade path available
> from FC1 to FC2.. Is this not the case??
>
> What are specific issues that standout as problem in trying to upgrade
> from FC1 to FC2?
>
> Later..
>
>
I'd be interested to know the same. It also brings up another question:
start with FC1 or FC2?
--
regards,
shane
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list