unsubscribe
Robert McLachlan
rlmcommunications at joimail.com
Sun Mar 28 05:48:46 UTC 2004
----- Original Message -----
From: <fedora-list-request at redhat.com>
To: <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 5:58 PM
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 1, Issue 1446
Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-list at redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-list-request at redhat.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-list-owner at redhat.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: vpn on FC1 (Ernesto Celis)
2. KDE 3.2 (Steve Waggitt)
3. Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) (Alexander Dalloz)
4. Re: Re: DNS Woes (stucklenp at charter.net)
5. Re: alsa modules loaded but alsamixer won't work (Gavin Henry)
6. Fedora Core 2 release??? (Bernd Kauling)
7. Re: Fedora Core 2 release??? (Bart Kalita)
8. Re: DNS Woes (Jeff Vian)
9. Re: DNS Woes (Jeff Vian)
10. Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) (Fabr?cio Santos)
11. Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) (jludwig)
12. Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) (Alexander Dalloz)
13. Re: Re: DNS Woes (stucklenp at charter.net)
14. Re: OpenGl Ati (Tom 'Needs A Hat' Mitchell)
15. Re: Re: DNS Woes (jludwig)
16. Re: DNS Woes (Aaron Matteson)
17. Re: OpenGl Ati (Mike Atamas)
18. Re: Fedora Core 2 release??? (Bernd Kauling)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:54:46 -0600
From: Ernesto Celis <celisdelafuente at prodigy.net.mx>
Subject: Re: vpn on FC1
To: fedora-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <1080431686.20675.11.camel at litux>
Content-Type: text/plain
> Hi all,
>
> We need secure remote access to a few TCP servers running
> on our FC1 host. These include pop3,imap,pserver(cvs) and
> telnetd. The clients are both based on XP and FC1.
>
> I think that SSH is perfect for that task but I first want
> to be sure that it will run fine on FC1.
SSH does a great job when remote management is needed.
I have a web & ftp server running fedora core 1 at work since january,
and I do remote administration from my FC1 box at home througt
pptpclient and SSH, the VPN server on my work network is NT and
I'll do remote administration from Windows Pc's using PuTTY
when I'm in the office.
Cheers
Ernesto
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:21:09 +0000
From: Steve Waggitt <steve.m.waggitt at ntlworld.com>
Subject: KDE 3.2
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200403280021.10177.steve.m.waggitt at ntlworld.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I've been trying to get apt configured so that I can upgrade to KDE 3.2.
I've
tried following the instructions on the KDE Red Hat pages but keep getting a
failed message when updating the package lists with apt. Any help would be
appreciated.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:28:41 +0100
From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz at uni-bielefeld.de>
Subject: Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-)
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1080433720.7065.499.camel at sirendipity.dogma.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Am So, den 28.03.2004 schrieb FabrÃcio Santos um 00:41:
> Viva Alexander,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
> Fedora is behind the router. Hence the packet trace showing a source IP on
> the internet 13.13.13.13 and the destination 192.168.1.1 as port
forwarding
> had already been applied. It may be a bit confusing but my router is not
> 192.168.1.1... :-) It was the router before I got myself a wireless router
> switch and it kept using that same IP after that.
Fedora behind a router ... So it is clear that the router has to forward
the ports 6666 and 8080 to the Fedora box. Is that working?
> I'm really clueless here... :-/ so thanks in advance for any help.
>
> PS. I hope formating will be ok now... O:-) And sorry for the long email.
Thank you, plain text is perfect. :)
> -fs
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl
Sirendipity 01:26:01 up 8 days, 10:08, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.05
[ Î"νÏ?θι Ïf'αÏ.Ï"ον - gnothi seauton ]
my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040328/dc6e8606/attachment.bin
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 0:43:07 +0000
From: <stucklenp at charter.net>
Subject: Re: Re: DNS Woes
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200403280043.i2S0h7Ds058087 at mxsf25.cluster1.charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mark:
route -n yields
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
IFace
24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0
"route print" on Windoze yields:
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx 20
24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20
24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 1
Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1
where "24.159.201.xxx" is the leased IP.
Thanks for any assistance.
Paul
>
> From: Mark Neidorff <mark at neidorff.com>
> Date: 2004/03/27 Sat PM 05:54:13 GMT
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: DNS Woes
>
> There is a lot of information missing here.
>
> I assuming you are using fedora.
> Are you using webmin?
> What happens when you run (as root) route -n ? Is your gateway listed? Is
> it correct?
>
> Lets start there.
>
> Mark
>
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 stucklenp at charter.net wrote:
>
> > I have a challenge: since running "yum update" and blindly accepting
all the packages and then rebooting, I have not been able to get my Fedora
box on the Web. Since that system is my firewall box it is really important
that I get it running again. Note that I get the same symptoms with or
without the firewall running.
> >
> > The NIC is configured to "Automatically obtain IP address settings with
DHCP" and "Automatically obtain DNS information from provider" (I have tried
manually setting DNS addresses as well.)
> >
> > When the network service is started, the NIC does get a valid IP from
the ISP, as verified by the ISP. As well, I see the lease information in
the messages log.
> > "...dhclient: bound to <myIP> -- renual in 13961 seconds...
> > ifup: done...
> > network: Bringing up interface etho: succeeded"
> >
> >
> > Other Symptoms:
> > ping <external IP> results in "Destination port Unreachable."
> > ping <leased IP> Works fine.
> >
> > Redhat Network Configuration show the NIC active and "ok"
> > resolve.conf contains the correct IPs for the ISP's DNS servers.
> >
> > To add insult to injury, when I plug my Windoze box into the cable modem
and set its IP to use DHCP, I have no problem attaching to the Web.
> >
> > Any ideas as to how I can resolve this?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sign over a gynecologist's office: "Dr. Jones, at your cervix."
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:52:17 +0000
From: Gavin Henry <gavin.henry at magicfx.co.uk>
Subject: Re: alsa modules loaded but alsamixer won't work
To: gongolas at verizon.net, For users of Fedora Core releases
<fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200403280052.22205.gavin.henry at magicfx.co.uk>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 25 Mar 2004 02:20, S. Gongola wrote:
> I've loaded ALSA rpms and the alsa modules are loaded.
> Sound works through oss emulation but when I run alsamixer.
> alsamixer: function snd_ctl_open failed for default: No such file or
> directory Has anyone had a similar problem.
This might be due to bad permissions in /dev/snd/*
as root run:
chmod a+rw /dev/snd/*
It should be fine after this.
- --
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.
http://www.magicfx.co.uk
http://FedoraNEWS.ORG/ghenry
http://www.suretecsystems.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAZiHFgNqd7Kng8UoRAqkoAKCzEnCTOjcozOgfpjZhLut9ZgjexgCeNGEw
rnp71vaFxJabirp1h1KtZCY=
=FrQ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: 28 Mar 2004 03:02:46 +0200
From: Bernd Kauling <bkauling at initdefault.de>
Subject: Fedora Core 2 release???
To: "fedora-list at redhat.com" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1080435766.3985.3.camel at Anki.mynet>
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi everybody
i just wanted to ask, if there is a release date for fedora core 2
known.
I can't find any information on the fedora site of the next release
date.
regards: Bernd
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 02:05:32 +0100
From: Bart Kalita <bartk at clara.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2 release???
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <406624DC.6020504 at clara.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/
Bernd Kauling wrote:
>Hi everybody
>
>i just wanted to ask, if there is a release date for fedora core 2
>known.
>
>I can't find any information on the fedora site of the next release
>date.
>
>regards: Bernd
>
>
>
>
--
____________________________________________________
Bart Kalita MCP
Registered Linux user #347493 Fedora Core 2
www.bart-domain.com www.astradine.no-ip.org
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:07:27 -0600
From: Jeff Vian <jvian10 at charter.net>
Subject: Re: DNS Woes
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4066254F.9000102 at charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
stucklenp at charter.net wrote:
>Mark:
>
>route -n yields
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
IFace
>24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 eth0
>127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo
>0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0
>
>"route print" on Windoze yields:
>Active Routes:
>Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx
20
> 24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> 24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
20
> 24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
> 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 1
>Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1
>
>where "24.159.201.xxx" is the leased IP.
>
>Thanks for any assistance.
>
>Paul
>
>
>
1. An earlier suggestion was to power off then back on the modem. Have
you done that?
2. What is the output of 'ifconfig eth0' ? Does it match the
24.159.201.xxx above?
3. Can you ping the eth0 address?
I have at times had to power off then back on the modem, followed by
'service network restart' when my cable ISP went braindead. That
sequence usually works.
Jeff
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:08:54 -0600
From: Jeff Vian <jvian10 at charter.net>
Subject: Re: DNS Woes
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <406625A6.5060500 at charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
stucklenp at charter.net wrote:
>Mark:
>
>route -n yields
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
IFace
>24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 eth0
>127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo
>0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0
>
>"route print" on Windoze yields:
>Active Routes:
>Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx
20
> 24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> 24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
20
> 24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
> 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 1
>Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1
>
>where "24.159.201.xxx" is the leased IP.
>
>Thanks for any assistance.
>
>Paul
>
I forgot to ask if you can ping the gateway (24.159.200.1) ??
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:09:03 +0200
From: Fabr?cio Santos <fabricio.santos at quicknet.nl>
Subject: Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-)
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <00f501c41461$d128c5f0$0201a8c0 at sereia>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Fedora behind a router ... So it is clear that the router has to forward
> the ports 6666 and 8080 to the Fedora box. Is that working?
Thanks for your help... I just solved the problem. I was being a bit dumb as
there was no default route defined... I had not tried to connect from Fedora
to anywhere else other than my local network yet because it is meant to be a
server only... :-D LOL When I tried to do a wget to the Internet I got
nowhere and "route" showed me the light... :-/ But the annoying thing is the
result is similar to a firewall that drops the packets. :-)
Anyway, my interface was set up by DHCP and I'm not sure if the default
gateway should also be aquired using this protocol. Obviously this was not
the case... For now I have done it manually but if anyone knows a way of
automating this task. Otherwise I will just add the "route add default gw
192.168.1.5" at the end of the S10network rc script start section.
Thanks!
-fs
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:18:43 -0500
From: jludwig <wralphie at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-)
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1080436722.3447.5.camel at jMOD.home>
Content-Type: text/plain
There are a bunch of kernel level filtering and routing 'setups' that
are disconnected from the firewall (see /proc/sys/net/ipv4/)
Including tcp_syscookies etc.
--
jludwig <wralphie at comcast.net>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:21:25 +0200
From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz at uni-bielefeld.de>
Subject: Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-)
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1080436885.7065.501.camel at sirendipity.dogma.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Am So, den 28.03.2004 schrieb FabrÃcio Santos um 03:09:
> Anyway, my interface was set up by DHCP and I'm not sure if the default
> gateway should also be aquired using this protocol. Obviously this was not
> the case... For now I have done it manually but if anyone knows a way of
> automating this task. Otherwise I will just add the "route add default gw
> 192.168.1.5" at the end of the S10network rc script start section.
GATEWAY is to be set in /etc/sysconfig/network.
> Thanks!
>
> -fs
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl
Sirendipity 03:20:47 up 8 days, 11:02, load average: 0.06, 0.11, 0.08
[ Î"νÏ?θι Ïf'αÏ.Ï"ον - gnothi seauton ]
my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040328/ddfc72a3/attachment.bin
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 1:29:50 +0000
From: <stucklenp at charter.net>
Subject: Re: Re: DNS Woes
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200403280129.i2S1Toec002296 at mxsf16.cluster1.charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sorry... forgot to answer that one. I was instructed by the ISP to
power-down the cable modem for one hour and did so. The problem still
exists only with the Linux system, but not with the Windoze system.
Linux (Fedora) can not ping the gateway or any other IP on the outside
world; it can ping the NIC IP assigned by the ISP.
ifconfig eth0 does not have the leased IP (24.159.201.xxx) in its output
lines, only what I have shown below.
Paul
>
> From: Jeff Vian <jvian10 at charter.net>
> Date: 2004/03/28 Sun AM 01:07:27 GMT
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: DNS Woes
>
>
>
> stucklenp at charter.net wrote:
>
> >Mark:
> >
> >route -n yields
> >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
IFace
> >24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0
eth0
> >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo
> >0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0
eth0
> >
> >"route print" on Windoze yields:
> >Active Routes:
> >Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface
Metric
> > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx
20
> > 24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> > 24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
20
> > 24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
1
> > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
1
> >Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1
> >
> >where "24.159.201.xxx" is the leased IP.
> >
> >Thanks for any assistance.
> >
> >Paul
> >
> >
> >
> 1. An earlier suggestion was to power off then back on the modem. Have
> you done that?
>
> 2. What is the output of 'ifconfig eth0' ? Does it match the
> 24.159.201.xxx above?
>
> 3. Can you ping the eth0 address?
>
> I have at times had to power off then back on the modem, followed by
> 'service network restart' when my cable ISP went braindead. That
> sequence usually works.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:35:16 -0800
From: "Tom 'Needs A Hat' Mitchell" <mitch48 at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: OpenGl Ati
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20040328013516.GB26487 at xtl1.xtl.tenegg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:07:54PM -0500, Mike Atamas wrote:
> Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
>
> I am using the properiety ati drivers. When I installed them everything
> worked fine. Now it tells me Error: couldn't get fbconfig when I try to
> run fgl_glxgears and all opengl things barely crawl. What is the problem?
How does the ati driver interact with the Mesa GL stuff?
With nVidia if the wrong library was found things break or go
so slow you think they are broken.
I would suggest a revisit of the ati install process.
--
T o m M i t c h e l l
/dev/null the ultimate in secure storage.
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:36:43 -0500
From: jludwig <wralphie at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Re: DNS Woes
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1080437802.3447.22.camel at jMOD.home>
Content-Type: text/plain
>From the command line add route add default gateway 24.159.200.1 dev
eth0. There are some GUI network setups under System Settings. I can't
seem to remember where to permanently set static routes.
--
jludwig <wralphie at comcast.net>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:37:12 -0800
From: Aaron Matteson <fedora at cryptosystem.us>
Subject: Re: DNS Woes
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20040328013712.19699.qmail at mail.avlug.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Jeff Vian became daring and sent these 1.6K bytes,
>
>
> stucklenp at charter.net wrote:
>
> >Mark:
> >
> >route -n yields
> >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> >IFace
> >24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0
eth0
> >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo
> >0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0
eth0
> >
> >"route print" on Windoze yields:
> >Active Routes:
> >Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface
Metric
> > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx
20
> > 24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> > 24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
20
> > 24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
1
> > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
> > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
1
> >Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1
> >
> >where "24.159.201.xxx" is the leased IP.
> >
> 1. An earlier suggestion was to power off then back on the modem. Have
> you done that?
Fixed the problem for me.
> 2. What is the output of 'ifconfig eth0' ? Does it match the
> 24.159.201.xxx above?
>
> 3. Can you ping the eth0 address?
>
> I have at times had to power off then back on the modem, followed by
> 'service network restart' when my cable ISP went braindead. That
> sequence usually works.
--
0 1 0 Aaron M Matteson - GnuPG:0xD144B7FF
0 0 1 Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write,
1 1 1 it should be hard to understand!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://cryptosystem.us/ - Project
http://cryptosystem.us/blog/ - Blog
http://mindstorm.ath.cx:8080/ - Wiki
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:40:57 -0500
From: Mike Atamas <psychomohel at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: OpenGl Ati
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <40662D29.5030105 at comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
I have fixed the problem. It happened during an update when Mesa GL was
updated. It overwrote the libGL provided by ati. All it took was to
reinstall the drivers and reboot ( dont know why that helped )
Mike
Tom 'Needs A Hat' Mitchell wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:07:54PM -0500, Mike Atamas wrote:
>
>>Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
>>
>>I am using the properiety ati drivers. When I installed them everything
>>worked fine. Now it tells me Error: couldn't get fbconfig when I try to
>>run fgl_glxgears and all opengl things barely crawl. What is the problem?
>
>
> How does the ati driver interact with the Mesa GL stuff?
>
> With nVidia if the wrong library was found things break or go
> so slow you think they are broken.
>
> I would suggest a revisit of the ati install process.
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: 28 Mar 2004 03:58:14 +0200
From: Bernd Kauling <bkauling at initdefault.de>
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2 release???
To: bartk at clara.co.uk, For users of Fedora Core releases
<fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1080439094.3985.5.camel at Anki.mynet>
Content-Type: text/plain
Thank you.
it's very embarassing, that i hadn't found this ^^
regards: Bernd
------------------------------
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 1, Issue 1446
********************************************
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list