Re: Raid1 mdadm: RAID1 error: mdadm: No super block found on ...

[Reinhard Sy <reinhard meinberlikomm de>]

Thanks,
sorry that I does not read the manpage - carefully.


What does :

State: dirty, no erros 
mean ?
[root muckla root]# mdadm -E /dev/hda1
/dev/hda1:
          Magic : a92b4efc
        Version : 00.90.00
           UUID : 1628b05f:8e582771:6bc25a99:b080ab1f
  Creation Time : Sun May  2 21:53:46 2004
     Raid Level : raid1
    Device Size : 4882624 (4.66 GiB 4.100 GB)
   Raid Devices : 2
  Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 0

    Update Time : Mon May  3 05:49:54 2004
          State : dirty, no-errors
 Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0
       Checksum : eb64d179 - correct
         Events : 0.13


      Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
this     0       3        1        0      active sync   /dev/hda1
   0     0       3        1        0      active sync   /dev/hda1
   1     1      22        1        1      active sync   /dev/hdc1
[root muckla root]# 

Thanks 
Reinhard

On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 01:39, Christopher K. Johnson wrote:
> Reinhard Sy wrote:
> 
> >Hi 
> >
> >I have now set my RAID1 but if I use :
> >
> >[root muckla root]# mdadm -E /dev/md0
> >mdadm: No super block found on /dev/md0 (Expected magic a92b4efc, got
> >00000000)
> >
>  From man mdadm
> "       -E, --examine
>               Print content of md superblock on device(s).
>  ...
>        --examine
>               The device should be a component of an  md  array. "
> 
> So you should be trying mdadm -E /dev/hda1
> 
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>    "Spend less!  Do more!  Go Open Source..." -- Dirigo.net
>    Chris Johnson, RHCE #807000448202021