Am Mo, den 24.05.2004 schrieb Roland Wolters um 01:12:
> You are right, sure, I've read it, but you can found something similar at
> freshrpms.net, and dag has a similar philosophie, too, I think.
> I was confused cause some people talk about fedora.us as a third party repo,
> and some people talk about as a extra, but official repo.
http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraUsersFAQ
That should answer your questions. Not that hard to find ;)
> And whats about the fereshrpms, dag, and so on? In some forums there are some
> discussions about the incompatibilitys of some packages from some repos (for
> example: many people report that freshrpm packages are not compatible with
> the packages of fedora.us/livna). So who made the failure there?
That is certainly a terrain where the combatants get quickly in hot
temper. I intend to keep out of such fights. But it is a fact, that
mixing some repositories can cause you "conflicts" (yes Michael, I have
your reply to my posting in mind). The question on which side there is a
failure may be better handed to the repository maintainers.
> Confused, Roland
not lucky with the current situation either, Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
Sirendipity 16:04:00 up 1 day, 22:00, load average: 1.45, 1.45, 1.33
[ ÎÎÏÎÎ Ï'ÎÏÏÎÎ - gnothi seauton ]
my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil