software RAID-0 recommendations
Jeff Vian
jvian10 at charter.net
Wed Sep 8 20:53:58 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 15:11, Christopher J. Bottaro wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > all RAID 0 does is double your chance of catastrophic
> > drive failure.
>
> what about doubling your read/write speed? =P
>
> p.s. i do understand that you won't get exactly linear speedup for each hard
> drive added to a RAID-0, but i'm just sayin...
>
Every raid structure has benefits and disadvantages.
raid 0 -- striping -- faster writes than single drives at the
disadvantage of more failure points and no redundancy
raid 1 -- mirroring -- faster reads & redundancy - at the expense of
doubled physical drives and slower writes
raid 5 -- striping with parity -- faster writes, more fault tolerant,
less extra hardware than raid 1 -- at the expense of slower write than
raid 1 due to the parity stripe that has to be written.
This is not an exhaustive list, but just note that the only improvement
with raid 0 is read/write speed and an overall loss of reliability
because of the increased failure points.
IF your slowdown is the actual drive IO then raid 0 can produce and
improvement, BUT ..... .
Please always analyze the actual problem and then decide which is best.
Many do not need the gain from using raid 0 (but some do).
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list