RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
Edward
edward at tripled.iinet.net.au
Fri Sep 10 00:52:18 UTC 2004
Tom Diehl wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
>
>>At the moment, the Fedora updates tree is somewhat out of
>>hand (look, wow - 27G).
>>
>>Does anyone have any specific and concrete objections to
>>removing older, superceded, updates?
>
>
> I vote to nukem!! If someone wants them they have been around forever
> and they ahould be archiving them locally. IMO for the most part they are
> a waste of space and although disk is cheap when you are running a public
> mirror it gets expensive after a while.
>
> Just my $.02
>
> Tom
>
>
Yup, what he said...
Ed.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list