should this list be subscribed to f-announce-l?

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 08:07 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:

> Since fedora-announce-list seems to set a Reply-To: fedora-list anyway,
> followup discussions will naturally move to this list. I'm with William
> and most other people that have replied so far - please keep the lists
> separate.

Thanks to everyone for replying, that's why I asked. :)

This was just an idea that Rahul and I had, wanting to be sure that the
announcements really make it to people.  It looks like they have a fair
chance of doing so.

I'll watch this thread for a while, to see if the consensus shifts
any.  :)

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050819/8ad455f9/attachment-0001.sig>