[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox yahoo com au>
- To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:40:56 +1030
Hi,
I don't use spamassassin, I find it more of a hindrance than a help, so
I wanted to remove it.
yum remove spamassassin
...[snip]...
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Removing:
spamassassin i386 3.0.4-2.fc4 installed 1.8 M
Removing for dependencies:
evolution i386 2.2.3-2.fc4 installed 24 M
And trying "rpm -e spamassassin" produces the same sort of response.
Surely this is a stupid dependency? It's supposedly *optional* whether
you use anti-spam filtering in Evolution (I've never allowed it's junk
mail checking), why should it *have* to be present?
--
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]