Asterisk on FC3

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Di, den 05.07.2005 schrieb Andreas Wahlert um 11:34:

> ok i try to answer without flaming :-)

Thanks for the answer :)

> I'm realy not a fan of ISA, but if you have only M$ Servers behind it 
> and the local admin's are not realy experts in firewalling, it's an 
> comfortable product.

Does the local admin need to be a firewall expert? Normally there is not
much need to fluently change firewalling rules.

> You can route to several internal http Servers in considuration of the 
> hostheaders. You have an outlook RPC Filter (uuuhhhhh). The Proxy is 
> integrated in AD an so on.

I see the money cows ;)

> OK OK. If it's possible i use ipfw or iptables too, but sometimes there 
> are customers, that want to use M$ only. :-(

iptables (Linux) or ipfilter (FreeBSD) or PF (OpenBSD / FreeBSD) are
pretty powerful.

> Andreas

Back to your initial question: as neither Asterisk is an application
designed on or with Fedora (any repository having it packaged? don't
know any) and especially the M$ ISA product being non FOSS you are
better asking your question on the Asterisk mailing list or on any M$
forum.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp 
Serendipity 12:01:42 up 9 days, 18:53, load average: 0.20, 0.17, 0.11 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050705/4d29b35a/attachment-0001.sig>