Bind Question

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Do, den 21.07.2005 schrieb Terry Polzin um 14:58:

> > Can you please be specific which permissions are false from your point
> > of view after a bind update? If it is a packaging mistake, then we need
> > a bugzilla add. But maybe the bind maintainer expects permissions need
> > to be differently than you think.

> I had to change permissions on /var/named to 770 from 750 in order for root to 
> start named, could not write the pid file without write for group current 
> perms/ownership:
> 
> drwxrwx---   4 root named   4096 Jul 20 12:54 named

Are you running bind chrooted or "normal"? Where is your named.pid file
located? The package defines:

%attr(750,root,named) %dir /var/named
%attr(770,named,named) %dir /var/run/named

and the pid file should be in /var/run/named, which is for chrooted
mode /var/named/chroot/var/run/named. The chroot permission
sets of the rpm look ok too:

%attr(770,root,named) %dir %prefix/var
%attr(770,root,named) %dir  %prefix/var/run
%attr(770,named,named) %dir %prefix/var/run/named

You mangled the permissions of some directories somehow?

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp 
Serendipity 15:13:09 up 5 days, 19:45, load average: 0.25, 0.20, 0.20 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050721/ba70b3f6/attachment-0001.sig>