Fedorafaq -Is this the best that we (fedora community) can do?

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Fr, den 29.07.2005 schrieb Timothy Murphy um 14:49:

> Captain Bubudiu wrote:
> 
> >> What exactly is your complaint?
> >> Are you referring to the Unofficial FAQ at
> >> <http://www.fedorafaq.org>?
> 
> > Yeah it should be self-explanatory.
> 
> I still don't understand what you mean.
> 
> It seems to me a fairly standard FAQ,
> with a list of queries and answers.
> 
> What exactly is a "self-explanatory" FAQ?

I am sure that with "self-explanatory" the Captain means that it should
have been obvious from his posting that he is speaking about the
unofficial FAQ and nothing else.

> Timothy Murphy  

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp 
Serendipity 17:59:44 up 13 days, 22:32, load average: 0.06, 0.10, 0.15 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050729/6031a8f0/attachment-0001.sig>