OS recommendations/Aging software issues
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Fri Jun 3 05:48:03 UTC 2005
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 23:25, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> I have been aware of this since it started. The issue in this case was,
> as you mentioned, that updates for RHL 7.3 are not a priority compared
> to other things and they were cracked once due to an un-patched
> vulnerability.
>
> Also, in this case, the required applications worked flawlessly on
> Fedora Core 3. They just didn't want to believe / trust it and opted to
> return to an un-patched RHL system with the same overall configuration
> as had been cracked before. Kind of a "devil you know vs. devil you
> don't" mentality.
Centos 3 probably wouldn't frighten the natives quite so badly - and
it is still getting regular updates promptly after they are released
for RHEL3.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list