tcp/routing question...

[bruce]

which is what i've been driving at...

which i'm also believing is a reasonably good sized market... particularly
if you can get homeland security to buy into the fact that terrorists are
making $$$ with phishing/pharming scams!!

you see matt, i've never looked at this as a purely tech issue with the
underlying protocols... but you need some way for the avg user to really be
able to tell.. that the site he's on, is the one he should be on.. in a
similar vein.. you need to be able to do the same thing from the server side
as well...

-bruce



-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of Matthew Miller
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:35 AM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: tcp/routing question...


On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:27:08AM -0700, bruce wrote:
> however, the issue with phishing has demonstrated that just having ssl is
> not enough.. so how is ipsec going to solve something differently than an
> ssl implementation..

SSL solves it adequately as far as I'm concerned. IPsec could make it more
ubiquitous. If you're asking "how can we keep people from being gullible",
then I'm afraid there really isn't a foolproof solution -- you know what
they say about the ingenuity of fools.

--
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 80 degrees Fahrenheit.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list