Scot L. Harris wrote: > On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 11:57, Serge wrote: >I think that should be TCP (135 + 445) instead. > >Serge > > > Isn't it 137, 138 UDP and 139 and 445 TCP? Lol, got it half wrong, sorry people, the 145 shocked me more than the 135 .... Luckily Scott is awake :) Serge