redhat to fedora

Mike McCarty mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Thu Sep 8 19:15:23 UTC 2005


Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 06:49, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> 
>>Am Di, den 30.08.2005 schrieb gaurav um 9:52:
>>
>>
>>>move  to redhat to debian or freebsd but never to fc on production server
>>
>>In this way of absolute statement I don't share that opinion. Fedora can
>>of course be a reliable platform for server tasks in a business
>>environment, just like Red Hat Linux once was.
> 
> 
> While you may be able to make fedora work for a server the
> Centos project makes a lot more sense for someone who
> likes Red Hat but doesn't want to deal with the fast fedora
> release cycle and can't pay for Red Hat Enterprise.
> http://www.centos.org
> 

I second this opinion. IMO, FCx is not the proper OS for a
workplace environment. No criticism of FCx, just a matter
of using the right tool for the right job. For one who is
developing a product and wants to be "leading edge", FCx is
fine.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!




More information about the fedora-list mailing list