fedora-list Digest, Vol 30, Issue 16
Randy Easley
REasley at Teleflora.com
Wed Aug 2 18:18:03 UTC 2006
Use FC3 or higher on Dell Poweredge Servers. I use the exact same setup you have and it works very well. Hardware raid will not work however.
I began with FC3 and since have since updated straight to FC5 nicely.
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of fedora-list-request at redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 5:06 AM
To: fedora-list at redhat.com
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 30, Issue 16
Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-list at redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-list-request at redhat.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-list-owner at redhat.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server? (Graham Cossey)
2. Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server? (Anthony Messina)
3. Re: skype (luca porcu)
4. Re: skype (luca porcu)
5. how to create a vi macro (Jerin Jacob K)
6. Re: skype (Fran?ois Patte)
7. Re: skype (luca porcu)
8. Process memory question. (Dan Track)
9. Intel 3945ABG Wireless (Craig Preston)
10. Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless (Andy Green)
11. Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless (Craig Preston)
12. Re: Process memory question. (Andy Green)
13. Re: How to use Apache 2 with HTTPS only? (Vinicius)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:27:36 +0100
From: "Graham Cossey" <graham.cossey at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server?
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
<aed6dd610608020127q3cf53679r1836dc7b669f3b88 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 8/2/06, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote:
> Graham Cossey schrieb:
>
> > I'm thinking about FC4 but as this is a development/test server the
> > primary objective is that anything running on this MUST also run on
> > the live server installed with RH3 ES-13.8.3
> >
> > I will of course ensure that the versions of PHP and MySQL etc match
> > the live server.
>
> Probably it is then best to get CentOS 3, which is an RHEL3 "clone".
> RHEL3 is based on ancient Red Hat Linux 9 and thus any Fedora release
> will be more or less different.
> Is the intended hardware RHEL3 certified? It then will run using CentOS
> 3 too.
>
I was wondering if older distros (like FC2 or those based on RH9)
would support the likes of SATA drives.
--
Graham
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:33:09 -0500
From: Anthony Messina <amessina at messinet.com>
Subject: Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server?
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <44D06345.8090401 at messinet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Graham Cossey wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote:
>> Graham Cossey schrieb:
>>
>> > I'm thinking about FC4 but as this is a development/test server the
>> > primary objective is that anything running on this MUST also run on
>> > the live server installed with RH3 ES-13.8.3
>> >
>> > I will of course ensure that the versions of PHP and MySQL etc match
>> > the live server.
>>
>> Probably it is then best to get CentOS 3, which is an RHEL3 "clone".
>> RHEL3 is based on ancient Red Hat Linux 9 and thus any Fedora release
>> will be more or less different.
>> Is the intended hardware RHEL3 certified? It then will run using CentOS
>> 3 too.
>>
> I was wondering if older distros (like FC2 or those based on RH9)
> would support the likes of SATA drives.
>
>
i have 3 dell servers here, all poweredges: SC600, 800, 1800.
all run without problems with fc3-fc5.
--
Anthony
http://messinet.com
http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/14a5874d/signature.bin
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:37:24 +0200
From: "luca porcu" <thedjpig at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: skype
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
<979e72a80608020137t5fbda272qc36a809764c5d531 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> I tried this in my .asoundrc:
>
> pcm.!card0 {
> type plug
> slave.pcm "dmixer"
> }
>
> pcm.dmixer {
> type dmix
> ipc_key 1024
> slave {
> pcm "hw:1,0"
> period_time 0
> period_size 1024
> buffer_size 4096
> rate 44100
> }
> bindings {
> 0 0
> 1 1
> }
> }
>
> ctl.dmixer {
> type hw
> card 0
> }
>
> And it seems to work (just simple tests made). Maybe there is a better
> solution? I don't know much about ALSA.
Hi,
repeat:
I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix!
try skype with out .asoundrc!
lu
--
Il termine Hacker
Gli hacker sono delle persone dedicate all'elevato ideale di rendere
la tecnologia accessibile a tutti, persone dedite al culto della
bellezza e decise ad aiutare gli altri grazie alla potenza
tecnologica.
www.lucaporcu.com
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:37:24 +0200
From: "luca porcu" <thedjpig at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: skype
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
<979e72a80608020137t5fbda272qc36a809764c5d531 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> I tried this in my .asoundrc:
>
> pcm.!card0 {
> type plug
> slave.pcm "dmixer"
> }
>
> pcm.dmixer {
> type dmix
> ipc_key 1024
> slave {
> pcm "hw:1,0"
> period_time 0
> period_size 1024
> buffer_size 4096
> rate 44100
> }
> bindings {
> 0 0
> 1 1
> }
> }
>
> ctl.dmixer {
> type hw
> card 0
> }
>
> And it seems to work (just simple tests made). Maybe there is a better
> solution? I don't know much about ALSA.
Hi,
repeat:
I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix!
try skype with out .asoundrc!
lu
--
Il termine Hacker
Gli hacker sono delle persone dedicate all'elevato ideale di rendere
la tecnologia accessibile a tutti, persone dedite al culto della
bellezza e decise ad aiutare gli altri grazie alla potenza
tecnologica.
www.lucaporcu.com
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:11:26 +0530
From: Jerin Jacob K <jerinjacob at tataelxsi.co.in>
Subject: how to create a vi macro
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1154508086.10690.25.camel at jerin>
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi all
I want to create a vi macro for "+y and "+gP commands . and it has to
work on visual mode of vi
i tried something like this but it is not working
:map c "+y
:map v "+gP
Waiting for your inputs ...
Regards,
Jerin Jacob
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:12:57 +0530
From: Fran?ois Patte <francois.patte at math-info.univ-paris5.fr>
Subject: Re: skype
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <44D06591.5000300 at math-info.univ-paris5.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
luca porcu a écrit :
>
> Hi,
> repeat:
>
> I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix!
>
> try skype with out .asoundrc!
In that case, it doesn't work! What is your /etc/asound.conf ?
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Université Paris 5 - Paris
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:46:36 +0200
From: "luca porcu" <thedjpig at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: skype
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
<979e72a80608020146y58698c08n121be89a95e97889 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> > I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix!
> >
> > try skype with out .asoundrc!
>
> In that case, it doesn't work! What is your /etc/asound.conf ?
Do you have set ALSA in the audio option ini skype?
# more /etc/asound.conf
#Generated by system-config-soundcard, do not edit by hand
#SWCONF
#DEV 0
defaults.pcm.card 0
defaults.pcm.device 0
defaults.ctl.card 0
--
Il termine Hacker
Gli hacker sono delle persone dedicate all'elevato ideale di rendere
la tecnologia accessibile a tutti, persone dedite al culto della
bellezza e decise ad aiutare gli altri grazie alla potenza
tecnologica.
www.lucaporcu.com
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:16:11 +0100
From: "Dan Track" <dan.track at gmail.com>
Subject: Process memory question.
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
<9d5ddd1f0608020216u57903966nb5389e222b85daad at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi
Could someone please help me find a way to find out how much memory a
process is using, my question relates specifically to the analog
running wild on my server.
Thanks
Dan
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:44:57 +1000
From: "Craig Preston" <duffman23 at gmail.com>
Subject: Intel 3945ABG Wireless
To: fedora-list at redhat.com
Message-ID:
<6842681b0608020244y175712bctb80d78aa153a3922 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I have a laptop with an Intel 3945abg Wireless adaptor, and I'm having a
bugger of a time getting it working. Has anyone else got these going? I have
downloaded the linux drivers from the intel site and the ieee drivers. I am
having trouble getting the intel files to make. They fail with error 2. How
descriptive :)
Any help appreciated
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/95af3f02/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:47:32 +0100
From: Andy Green <andy at warmcat.com>
Subject: Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <44D074B4.50403 at warmcat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Craig Preston wrote:
> I have a laptop with an Intel 3945abg Wireless adaptor, and I'm having a
> bugger of a time getting it working. Has anyone else got these going? I
> have downloaded the linux drivers from the intel site and the ieee
> drivers. I am having trouble getting the intel files to make. They fail
> with error 2. How descriptive :)
>
> Any help appreciated
Yep I'm working good with the current ipw3945 stuff and current FC5
kernel. FWIW on the current kernel, I did not have to update the ieee
stuff IIRC.
Do you have kernel-smp-devel or kernel-devel package installed beforehand?
-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4492 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/f581c4f7/smime.bin
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:57:56 +1000
From: "Craig Preston" <duffman23 at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
<6842681b0608020257x7828a8cas719f587a20d34f13 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Yes I had the kernel-dev package installed.
On 02/08/06, Andy Green <andy at warmcat.com> wrote:
>
> Craig Preston wrote:
>
> > I have a laptop with an Intel 3945abg Wireless adaptor, and I'm having a
> > bugger of a time getting it working. Has anyone else got these going? I
> > have downloaded the linux drivers from the intel site and the ieee
> > drivers. I am having trouble getting the intel files to make. They fail
> > with error 2. How descriptive :)
> >
> > Any help appreciated
>
> Yep I'm working good with the current ipw3945 stuff and current FC5
> kernel. FWIW on the current kernel, I did not have to update the ieee
> stuff IIRC.
>
> Do you have kernel-smp-devel or kernel-devel package installed beforehand?
>
> -Andy
>
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/1b6b2be4/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:00:35 +0100
From: Andy Green <andy at warmcat.com>
Subject: Re: Process memory question.
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <44D077C3.70004 at warmcat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Dan Track wrote:
> Hi
>
> Could someone please help me find a way to find out how much memory a
> process is using, my question relates specifically to the analog
> running wild on my server.
top
and then press
Shift-M
will give some idea.
You can get a buttload of good info on a particular process from its
Process ID number. Eg, for PID 18053
cat /proc/18053/status
Name: ekiga
State: S (sleeping)
SleepAVG: 97%
Tgid: 18053
Pid: 18053
PPid: 3249
TracerPid: 0
Uid: 500 500 500 500
Gid: 500 500 500 500
FDSize: 256
Groups: 14 500
VmPeak: 118920 kB
VmSize: 118432 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmHWM: 23592 kB
VmRSS: 23292 kB
VmData: 18504 kB
VmStk: 84 kB
VmExe: 900 kB
VmLib: 35996 kB
VmPTE: 220 kB
StaBrk: 081a2000 kB
Brk: 09571000 kB
StaStk: bfe32e20 kB
Threads: 10
SigQ: 0/20329
SigPnd: 0000000000000000
ShdPnd: 0000000000000000
SigBlk: 0000000000000000
SigIgn: 0000000000000000
SigCgt: 000000018c005ef3
CapInh: 0000000000000000
CapPrm: 0000000000000000
CapEff: 0000000000000000
Cpus_allowed: ffffffff
Mems_allowed: 1
For all these though, understand that shared libs get counted for every
process, exploding the total figures given for all processes compared to
actual global memory usage.
-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4492 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/10f62a2b/smime.bin
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 07:04:43 -0300
From: Vinicius <cviniciusm at uol.com.br>
Subject: Re: How to use Apache 2 with HTTPS only?
To: fedora-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <eaptca$dtp$1 at sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Tim escreveu:
> Vinicius:
>>>> I did do "RedirectPermanent / https://myserver.com/", but the site is
>>>> presenting an error.
>
> Tim:
>>> Which one? The redirecting HTTP one, or the HTTPS one they're directed
>>> to?
>
> You haven't answered the above. Which part of the server is presenting
> the error.
>
It's in the past now. When I disabled the "Listen" and the
"RedirectPermanent" directives then both the server and the client are
working fine with HTTPS. The server is only serving HTTPS.
>
>>>> Both the server and the client use certificates issued by a local CA,
>>>> and I created a SSLRequire rule to allow only the client to enter the
>>>> site. I think the SSL check failed because of the RedirectPermanent.
>
>>> More details needed. Server configuration, the specific redirection
>>> rules, at least.
>
>
> Vinicius:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I did do the following:
>> 1. created a CA certificate;
>> 2. created a server certificate signed by the CA;
>> 3. created a client certificate, CA as root; Imported it to Firefox;
>> 4. created a "SSLRequire" rule to allow only this specific client to
>> enter the site. It checks the O, OU and the CN.
>> 5. disabled the "Listen" Directive for HTTP.
>
> In what way did you "disable" it? I seem to recall that if you don't
> have one, you end up with defaults.
>
>> Now, I would like to use DAV, but the application DAVExplorer's
>> (DAVExplorerSSL.sh) authentication fails with the message: "Connection
>> error: javavx.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException: peer not
>> authenticated". I have entered the address https://localhost/upload .
>>
>> The snippet of httpd.conf regarding DAV:
>> "
>> <Directory /var/www/upload>
>> Dav On
>> AuthName "Top Secret"
>> AuthUserFile /var/davpasswd
>> AuthType Basic
>> </Directory>
>> "
>
> I'd fix other problems before starting on a new one, but basic
> authentication and HTTPS aren't compatible with each other.
>
I have heard that's possible to use DAV and SSL together.
Any ideas, pl'ease?
TIA,
Vinicius.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/21e88b16/signature.bin
------------------------------
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 30, Issue 16
*******************************************
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list