[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: 'GPL encumbrance problems' (jdow)
- From: "STYMA, ROBERT E (ROBERT)" <stymar lucent com>
- To: "'brtaylor sanfelipe com mx'" <brtaylor sanfelipe com mx>, "'For users of Fedora Core releases'" <fedora-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: 'GPL encumbrance problems' (jdow)
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:31:09 -0700
> > Does your application work without the GPL library? No? So your
> > application _needs_ someone else his copyrighted work to
> function. So
> > you _need_ the work someone else did to make money? And you _demand_
> > that it comes for free and gratis! If you don't like the
> GPL license of
> > the library, rewrite it, nothing stops you from doing that.
>
The direction this discussion is going seems to be that if code
makes use of a shared library (.so) directly or indiretly which
is GPL'ed and that code is to be distributed, it has to be GPL'ed.
A quick check of my FC4 box shows 654 .so files in /usr/lib. (not
counting soft links.) Is there a list showing which of these are
LGPL and which are GPL?
I seem to remember that libc.so is LGPL, so that takes care of
the "hello world" program.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]