VDQ : version number convention

[Keith G. Robertson-Turner]

Beartooth wrote:

> I dunno whether I never saw it, or did and forgot; I'm sure I should
> know, but don't: does FC have a numbering convention like some apps

Don't think so. Each release is just more "bleeding-edge" than the
previous. :)

> I seem to have a lot more trouble running odd-numbered FCs than even?

I guess you're just born lucky. :)

Seriously though, a lot of it has to do with the kernel. Later updates 
usually fix it though (but introduce a whole new set of problems).

IME eventually you'll find a kernel release that WorksForYou®. Also, 
just as "prelink" was a big problem in previous releases (fault lay 
mainly with static libs in other installed packages, but all fixed now 
AFAIK), SELinux seems to be having the same kind of teething/transition 
problems on FC5. Policy updates are being released regularly though, and 
of course you can just turn it off if you want, but just like prelink, I 
think eventually it will all settle down.

-
K.