FC4 to FC5 upgrade slow- UPDATE

Mark Haney mhaney at ercbroadband.org
Thu Oct 19 20:40:39 UTC 2006


Mark Haney wrote:
> Andy Green wrote:
>> Mark Haney wrote:
>>
>>>>> This box is a dual Opteron box with 4GB RAM.  Should it be that slow?
>>
>>>> It sounds to me like it is using swap, no matter what the RAM on the 
>>
>>> Well, when I looked at it before, it wasn't swapping out, I still 
>>> had about 1GB RAM free.  However, all the running processes 
>>> (anaconda, etc) from the installation were 'Sleeping'.  I wasn't 
>>> seeing much disk activity, or activity to the CD ROM drive.
>>
>> Well usually the processes that would rather be doing something else 
>> are blocked on IO if they are blocked at all.  On top this would show 
>> up on top as a lot on CPU on "system" and no idle CPU.  Maybe there 
>> is some problem with the install kernel vs your board?  Try
>>
>> dmesg
>>
>> and see if there is some spew of something going on, maybe with your 
>> HDD.  Also I guess check your
>>
>> cat /proc/cpuinfo
>>
>> and also see if anything on
>>
>> cat /proc/interrupts
>>
>> is cranking up at a crazy rate.  Another trick is to do
>>
>> ps -Af
>>
>> and look at the last few processes, usually that list is in order of 
>> spawning, so you can see if a scriptlet is running something that is 
>> making it stick.
>>
>> -Andy
>>
> Well I"m not seeing anything really out of the ordinary.  In dmesg, 
> I'm seeing some SELinux 'denied' messages, but not a lot of them.  The 
> CPUinfo looks correct.  I'm seeing a lot of interrupts in IO-APIC 
> timer, and ps -Af doesn't show anything hanging that I can see.
>

Just thought I"d update everyone on my travails with the FC4 to FC5 
upgrade.  Because the upgrade itself just would not complete the first 
disc, I blew away the original install and decided to try to install FC5 
fresh.  FC5 installed just beautifully, it was blazingly fast and I 
didn't encounter any problems at all.  (WEll, other than my 3TB LVM 
volume not being able to set a mount point from the install)

Turns out, my predecessor, in his infinite wisdom, liked to install 
every single package from in Fedora on every server he used here.  It 
didn't occur to me until earlier today that it's possible that yum was 
choking on the sheer amount of packages (and most likely packages that 
were moved from the FC4 base to Extras in FC5.  If I had cleaned out all 
the packages I didn't need on that server, it's likely the upgrade would 
have been just fine.

Thanks again for all the help on this.

-- 
Ceterum censeo, Carthago delenda est.

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415




More information about the fedora-list mailing list