[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: What is the consensus on the best partition scheme and size?/Keeping home separate
- From: Joe Klemmer <klemmerj webtrek com>
- To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: What is the consensus on the best partition scheme and size?/Keeping home separate
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:22:57 -0400
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 1) a separate /tmp to protect the root filesystem from /tmp overflow
> has always seemed to me like a good idea.
I can't remember why but there was some reason for not mounting /tmp as
a separate filesystem. It's probably buried along with "sync sync sync".
> 3) if i'm feeling bold and daring, i'll mount /usr read-only (as the
> FHS suggests it has the right to be). AFAIK, there's nothing in
> fedora core that requires /usr to be mounted read-write in normal
> operation, and i can always remount briefly when i'm installing or
> updating SW.
That is the proper and correct way to have /usr mounted.
--
Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe
See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]