[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: The case against LVM
- From: Timothy Murphy <tim birdsnest maths tcd ie>
- To: fedora-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: The case against LVM
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:44:23 +0100
Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
>> >> I've been using LVM on one computer for some time,
>> >> without any real problems.
>> >>
>> >> However, I've decided that it causes unnecessary complications,
>> >> as some applications do not seem to accept the LVM devices,
>> >> while I don't find any real advantages to compensate.
>>
>> >> I wonder if that is the general experience?
>>
>> > Definitely an asset when connected to a SAN.
>>
>> Why, as a matter of interest?
>>
> I think it depends more on the uses of the storage than the underlying
> technology, but it helps to have something with enough space to have
> some flexibility. I have a server with ~16Tb of storage that's shared
> amongst research groups in a university dept. Each group has their own
> filesystem, and LVM means that I can allocate space to whichever one
> particularly needs it without predicting up front who that will be.
I guess if I was in that position I would use LVM!
But I'm just a common-or-garden Linux user ...
[Reminds me of the Thurber cartoon with a mad-looking girl saying,
"Thank you God for making me normal".]
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]