Around 01:57am on Thursday, August 09, 2007 (UK time), Karl Larsen scrawled: > glad you like it. The cal program is VERY powerful. Cal is indeed excellent, even showing that the rules defined for leap years earlier in this thread are not correct. If it was as simple as divisible by 100 but not divisible by 400 = not leap year then: cal 2 1500 should not show February having 29 days, which it does. To get a clue as to why this is correct, try cal 9 1752 Steve -- Play Champions - my free football predictions game at: http://www.stevesearle.com/champs/about.html 18:57:17 up 4 days, 7:21, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.03, 0.06
Attachment:
pgpXEhXKORm45.pgp
Description: PGP signature