[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Livna repo broken?
- From: Aaron Konstam <akonstam sbcglobal net>
- To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Livna repo broken?
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:02:29 -0600
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 13:33 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
> On Fri February 9 2007 11:05:10 am Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > First of all smart does not use the original livna.repo. It
> > forces you to create a livna channel. This breaks the
> > structure of the livna.repo because smart, as far as I can
> > see, has the same bug as yumex. It cannot have a channel with
> > multiple baseurls.
> > At least that is what I found. So in my opinion it is smart
> > that is to blame not livna.
>
> I'm sorry, but this is just plain wrong. What do you mean "does
> not use the original livna repo"? Livna actually provides a
> script that sets up livna for smart, if you choose to run it. It
> sets up the livna channel with the livna baseurl, and it sets up
> the mirrors. And it works well. It's not supposed to have a
> channel with multiple base url's - it has a different syntax,
> and comparing it to yum or yumex is like mixing apples and
> orangutans
My statement was that smart does not use the livna.repo which is what
the OP asked about using. It does not but uses a channel equivalent
produced by running the script you spoke about. Now the question is does
the channel designate multiple baseurls or not. The livna.repo
identifies multiple baseurls. Does the smart channel? As far as I can
see it does not but I am willing to be corrected.
--
=======================================================================
No amount of careful planning will ever replace dumb luck.
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam sbcglobal net
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]