Cups broken and my stomach is upset - Anger Management in Action Danger! Danger! Will Robinson!

Tim ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Tue Jan 9 00:44:21 UTC 2007


On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:51 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Printers that accept postscript natively have always made life easier
> on Unix-like system where everything else requires output
> transformations.

First time I tried to get printing working on Linux, I rapidly came to
that conclusion.  However, trawling through all the local computer
vendors, none had any that did, and few knew anything about it.  They
were all Windows people - you install your XP drivers and it prints...

Even when you look on-line, it can be hard to find a decent printer (one
that you can afford, or even just manage to get supplied to where you
are).  They might list Linux compatibility, in some vague manner.
Likewise, they might mention Postscript, again in a vague manner.  Some
don't give any clues about what printing language they use, others are
misleading.  I've got a couple of laser printers (and old and dependable
HP LaserJet 4L, and an old and unreliable Kyocera FS-400), which I've
seen reports that at least one of can handle Postscript, directly, and
others that say they don't.




More information about the fedora-list mailing list