LVM or not (was: splitting off directories)

[Steve Searle]

Around 04:28pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2007 (UK time), Michael Klinosky scrawled:

> Steve:
> >I don't use LVM - I did when it first came out but never saw it as an
> >advantage to *me*.
> 
> hmmm ... I detect another thread.

Well if people want to start one, they can form here.  Please note that
the asteriscs around "me" in my original quote were intentional in tha
tI meant I didn't use it, as I hadn't found it to be advantageous to me
and my set up.  It was not meant idisparage LVM or to imply that it
wouldn't be useful for other people and their needs. 

Lets keep this thread clean, people :-)

Steve

-- 

A:  Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q:  Why is top-posting a bad thing?

 16:31:17 up 3 days, 14:04,  2 users,  load average: 1.20, 0.68, 0.33
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070620/8b410fd9/attachment-0001.sig>