Olaf Mueller wrote:
> I am wondering where are all the updates remain for fc6. Is fc6 bad
> supported although fc7 is not released?
I'm not sure why you'd think that. There are plenty of updates being
pushed for fc6 still.
> The packages I am missing updates for are:
> koffice*
I didn't feel like looking for this in bugzilla, but I'd bet it
wouldn't take long to check.
> clamav-server-sysv
> clamav-lib
> clamav-update
> clamav-milter-sysv
> clamav
> clamav-server
> clamav-data
> clamav-milter
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229202 .
> htdig (current fc6 version is not usable)
Is there a bugzilla entry about whatever problem you have with htdig?
> It is funny cause there are already new clamav-* (0.90) packages for
> fc7
See the bug above.
> But fc7 is not released and nobody of redhat or fedora core
> like to support fc6 any more, seems to me. But is not fc6 the version
> users are working with at the moment?
> Now, I am at the point I do not understand fedora any more.
> Ok, I get it. Fedora Core is only a playground, nothing more, nothing
> stable, nothing with a long lifespan.
> It is frustrating.
Ok, I get it. Ask a question, answer it yourself, make a mountain out
of a mole hill. What sort of response would you expect from the
above?
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
======================================================================
The problem is not that the world is full of fools. The problem is
that lightning isn't being distributed right.
-- Mark Twain
Attachment:
pgpy5vpSG8LdQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature