Re: solution to evolution problem

[Aaron Konstam <akonstam sbcglobal net>]

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 19:12 +1030, Tim wrote:
> obert Locke:
> >>> But, one thing I have learned to NOT do, is to set my sorting on
> the
> >>> Date column.  I have no down or up arrow on the date column. 
> 
> Tim:
> >> As one of those YMMV moments, I have threading turned on, *and*
> messages
> >> sorted on date (newest topmost).  Things are working fine for me.
> 
> Robert Locke:
> > It's only a "problem" for me if I delete the first message of a
> thread,
> > though, admittedly, I tended to sort it "oldest" first....
> 
> Same here, I just wrote it wrong, before.  I should have wrote
> *oldest*
> topmost...  Since I don't do it the other way, I don't know if there's
> a
> problem that way around.  Just in case that's important to someone
> else
> working through all of this.
> 
> > Sorting appears to be done on the first message in the thread.  When
> that first
> > message in the thread is deleted, the remainder of the thread is
> > "relocated" to an appropriate spot.
> 
> Since I turned off hiding deleted messages, I haven't seen the order
> scramble around.  I just turned it back on and tried deleting some
> mail.
See Tim I knew you were the one who told me that unhidding messages
would solve my problem.

> 
-- 
Aaron Konstam <akonstam sbcglobal net>