DD not working--SUCCESS!
Tim
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Sat Sep 1 00:51:23 UTC 2007
imalone:
>> How would you go about estimating a decent blocksize (other than by
>> testing)? My first instinct would be to go for some percentage of
>> the drive's cache.
Jacques B:
> Available RAM. Use as big a block size as can possibly be read into
> RAM (once you start caching to a drive you just as well be writing to
> the destination drive otherwise you slow it down even more). We
> played around with this a while back and it certainly makes a
> difference (stands to reason as was already explained).
>
> The one caveat would be if there are errors on the drive. If that is
> the case, a full block is dropped (so if your block size is 4096
> bytes, then 4K gets dropped instead of 512 bytes - now imagine
> dropping a 256 meg block of data...). ddrescue will use two block
> sizes - a larger one and a smaller one. If it hits an error it drops
> back to the smaller one until it gets pass the error and then ramps
> back up to the larger block size.
I had a little play around with blocksizes for dd a while ago, while
zeroing a drive (I was zeroing out a bad drive to see it it'd goad the
drive into automatically sorting out the bad blocks, by itself - it
did). The first attempt just started out using the default, and that
took ages. After a bit of fiddling, I settled for using about a meg.
Of course my situation was a bit different, but it's to show that you'd
tweak the option to suit your circumstances.
--
[tim at bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr
2.6.22.4-65.fc7 i686 i386
Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7.
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list