[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox yahoo com au>
- To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:43:22 +0930
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 12:21 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> The disks themselves. I've yet to meet a reliable disk, ever year or
> two one dies on me.
How do you treat them?
With all due respect to the Google research that says hot drives aren't
a problem, I don't buy it. Warm drives, maybe, but I've seen plenty
that get painfully hot, and those drives did become unreliable. When
I've built, or rebuilt, systems so that the drives don't roast, they
seem to last well.
You also want to minimise vibration. Use all four screw mount points,
and firmly. If you hear it buzzing, that's not good.
--
[tim bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr
2.6.22.4-65.fc7 i686 i386
Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7.
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]