Any hope of KDE 3.5 in F10? I want it too !

David Boles dgboles at gmail.com
Fri Jun 20 22:09:10 UTC 2008


Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 20 June 2008 21:09:57 Craig White wrote:
>> My experience is that each Linux
>> distribution has its own strengths and weaknesses and that all Linux
>> users benefit from having options.
> 
> Precisely.  I  use CentOS where I need total stability, Mandriva where I want 
> ease for technophobics and Fedora on the rest.  Where else do you get choice 
> like this?


Anne, and all KDE users. Do any of you really, and I mean really, believe that 
Fedora is responsible for the KDE 'problems'? That the KDE problems are not 
KDE's problems? That Fedora released in their ISO's a KDE that was made 
intentionally to 'break' KDE in Fedora?

I know that you don't Anne  ;-)  This is mostly addressed at the other users 
posting in these several threads.

Ok. How many of those of you that are disappointed or upset with KDE 4.x did 
any research *before* you installed/upgraded? How many of you downloaded a KDE 
Live-CD and actually tried it *before* you installed/upgraded?

If you did not look or try it first you have very little to really complain 
about here. Would you buy a car, a house, rent an apartment, buy a suit, buy a 
pair of shoes without first looking at them or trying them out/on? Try before 
you buy.
-- 


   David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080620/17f41c67/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list