Any hope of KDE 3.5 in F10? I want it too !

[David Boles]

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 18:09 -0400, David Boles wrote:
>> Anne Wilson wrote:
>>> On Friday 20 June 2008 21:09:57 Craig White wrote:
>>>> My experience is that each Linux
>>>> distribution has its own strengths and weaknesses and that all Linux
>>>> users benefit from having options.
>>> Precisely.  I  use CentOS where I need total stability, Mandriva where I want 
>>> ease for technophobics and Fedora on the rest.  Where else do you get choice 
>>> like this?
>>
>> Anne, and all KDE users. Do any of you really, and I mean really, believe that 
>> Fedora is responsible for the KDE 'problems'? That the KDE problems are not 
>> KDE's problems? That Fedora released in their ISO's a KDE that was made 
>> intentionally to 'break' KDE in Fedora?
>>
>> I know that you don't Anne  ;-)  This is mostly addressed at the other users 
>> posting in these several threads.
>>
>> Ok. How many of those of you that are disappointed or upset with KDE 4.x did 
>> any research *before* you installed/upgraded? How many of you downloaded a KDE 
>> Live-CD and actually tried it *before* you installed/upgraded?
> 
> I did that so I knew what I was getting into and I don't regret it for a
> moment.


Linux *needs* more users such as you sir. I tip my hat to you.

So many, too many, times I see this 'same' thread, with a different subject, 
repeated over and over.

I use GNOME myself. And that too breaks from time to time. Especially in Rawhide.

-- 


   David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080620/f6f3d8ae/attachment-0001.sig>