Any hope of KDE 3.5 in F10? I want it too !

David Boles dgboles at gmail.com
Sat Jun 21 14:35:12 UTC 2008


Timothy Murphy wrote:
> David Boles wrote:
> 
>> Chill out guy. All you are hearing is the sour grapes. The 'happiest'
>> never post. Except for Anne.
> 
> Maybe happy pills should be circulated with Linux distributions ...
> 
> Seriously, I think Anne is too kind.
> I am genuinely puzzled by the minor problems that came with KDE-4.
> It is as though the KDE-4 team was completely independent of the KDE-3 crew,
> and started again from scratch.
> 
> However, the problems in my view are or were minor,
> and certainly not worth writing to the Pope about.
> 
> I'd just ask the KDE and Fedora developers to bear in mind
> that simplicity is a virtue, and that a little time should be spent
> examining if it is possible to simplify the distribution,
> as eg Torvalds seems to me to do rather will with the kernel.


Bear this in mind to then. KDE developers are doing the actual developing of 
KDE 4.x and Fedora's KDE team is doing the packaging. KDE has been talking 
about these major changes for a long time.

And I can only imagine the screaming and complaints if Fedora had *not* 
provided KDE 4.0.  ;-)
-- 


   David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080621/0531909a/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list