Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 21:23 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 20:18 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:$ rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/fstab file /etc/fstab is not owned by any package# rpm -qf /etc/fstab setup-2.6.14-1.fc9.noarch # rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig filesystem-2.4.13-1.fc9.x86_64 #$ rpm -qf /etc/fstab file /etc/fstab is not owned by any package $ rpm -qf /etc filesystem-2.2.4-1 $ rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig/desktop file /etc/sysconfig/desktop is not owned by any package $ rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig filesystem-2.2.4-1 So, the point is made. The fact that RPM doesn't know about /etc/sysconfig/desktop doesn't mean that it isn't set up and populated by install. I don't know what set up /etc/sysconfig/desktop, possibly RPM as part of /etc/sysconfig. In any case, I know that, on my machine, I did not (directly) set up /etc/sysconfig/desktop.---- your fedora-core-2 system is entirely irrelevant to anybody but you.
I thought that the topic of immediate interst was whether
/etc/sysconfig/desktop _ever_ got set up and populated by
_some_ version of Fedora. I thought I saw you going back
in time as far as you could, and running out at FC7 or so.
Otherwise I wouldn't have commented or joined the thread.
Was I wrong? I think I could provide quotes from messages you
posted to that effect. If that isn't the immediate topic,
then I'd like to know what is.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!