[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: first yum went OK, however the second got the following
- From: Aaron Konstam <akonstam sbcglobal net>
- To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: first yum went OK, however the second got the following
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:37:13 -0500
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:31 -0400, Jim wrote:
> landon kelsey wrote:
> > Setting up Update Process
> > Resolving Dependencies
> > --> Running transaction check
> > ---> Package yum-utils.noarch 0:1.1.16-1.fc9 set to be updated
> > --> Processing Dependency: yum >= 3.2.19 for package: yum-utils
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > yum-utils-1.1.16-1.fc9.noarch from updates-newkey has depsolving problems
> > --> Missing Dependency: yum >= 3.2.19 is needed by package
> > yum-utils-1.1.16-1.fc9.noarch (updates-newkey)
> > Error: Missing Dependency: yum >= 3.2.19 is needed by package
> > yum-utils-1.1.16-1.fc9.noarch (updates-newkey)
> >
> >
> i ran into the same problem, I going to wait a few days and run the
> update for yum, by then somebody will fix the dependency.
>
Again this works now.
--
=======================================================================
If it's worth doing, it's worth doing for money.
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam sbcglobal net
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]