Arranging icons on desktop

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:27 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 10:11 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > How in evolution to you tell the program to thread by In-Reply-To
> > > header and not by subject?
> > 
> > Evo *always* threads by In-Reply-To where present and AFAIK this cannot
> > be turned off. It only falls back to thread-by-subject when there's no
> > In-Reply-To header.
> > 
> > > And if you thread by In-Reply-To hader threading how
> > > can you tell when the thread ends (since subject line can change)?
> > 
> > Isn't that the whole point? If the In-Reply-To header indicates the
> > message is part of a thread, then it *is* part of the thread, no matter
> > what the Subject says. People changing the topic of the message (*not*
> > the Subject, which is irrelevant in this scenario) are hijacking the
> > thread.
> > 
> > poc
> > 
> That is not the answer to my question. The answer is that evolution
> places in front of the subject line to delineate the beginning and end
> of the thread,

This last sentence doesn't parse. What are you trying to say?

poc