[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Arranging icons on desktop
- From: Bill Crawford <billcrawford1970 gmail com>
- To: fedora-list redhat com
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Arranging icons on desktop
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:04:49 +0100
On Monday 15 September 2008 23:02:47 Braden McDaniel wrote:
> Actually, it's for compatibility with Mozilla--the behavior of which is
> based on this broken-by-design document:
>
> http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html
If you read it carefully, it explains exactly what and WHY the original mozilla
(we're talking about Netscape version 3) used to do to thread messages. The
newer mozilla *stopped* doing it that way, hence Jamie's rant. Please could you
explain why you consider this "broken" ...?
> I think Outlook may be even more broken than this; for the longest time
> it didn't even look at References and In-Reply-To.
Outlook relies almost completely on the Subject. Most people I see here using
outlook don't appear to be doing any kind of threading anyway, just newest at
the top.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]