[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- From: Damian S <dsteward internode on net>
- To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:38:07 +1000
> There is no "better". There is "different".
Exactly.
I happily use SVN on my projects which only I commit to. Although I am
the only committer, this code needs to be pushed out to multiple
machines, both public and private.
I'll still use SVN if I get several other collaborators, but once there
are more than 3 or 4 people committing, I'll move to git which uses a
superior model for large numbers of committers.
FWIW, SVN was not designed to be the 'best'.
It was meant to be a better CVS than CVS, and in that goal, succeeded.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]