[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 60, Issue 38
- From: Aldo Foot <lunixer gmail com>
- To: kirk202 q com, "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 60, Issue 38
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:45:21 -0800
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:34 PM, kirk Ziegler <kirk202 q com> wrote:
>> -----------------------------
>>
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:22:15 +0530
>> From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org>
>> Subject: Re: F10 -- Xen, VirtualBox, or VMWare?
>> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
>> Fedora." <fedora-list redhat com>
>> Cc: "McGuffey, David C." <DAVID C MCGUFFEY saic com>
>> Message-ID: <498B5F8F 7010408 fedoraproject org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> McGuffey, David C. wrote:
>> > Rather than configuring a dual-boot machine for running those occasional
>> > Windows apps, which one of these virtualization tools provides the best
>> > (read most accurate) virtualization environment on F10? Which one is
>> > the easiest to install and configure?
>>
>> KVM (assuming you have the hardware support) with Virt-manager (if you
>> need a GUI)
>>
>> Rahul
>>
> I've been using VBox and its pretty user friendly. I'm running
> WindowsXP for a couple of programs. http://www.virtualbox.org/
>
> Kirk Ziegler
Why reply to a digest email in response to a completely different thread?
~af
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]