[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: self-signed certificates (was Re: I'd like to get rid of pulseaudio but ...)
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno wolff to>
- To: "Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" <wolfgang rupprecht+gnus200905 gmail com>
- Cc: fedora-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: self-signed certificates (was Re: I'd like to get rid of pulseaudio but ...)
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:02:04 -0500
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 13:08:08 -0700,
"Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" <wolfgang rupprecht+gnus200905 gmail com> wrote:
>
> As for the man-in-the-middle attack, I'd imagine the biggest usage case
> is an eavesdropped-in-the-middle and not someone that was able to break
> the data stream and insert themselves. Having an encrypted channel with
> a slightly nebulous endpoint is still better than having an unencrypted
> channel.
For average Joes, the most common problem is going to be that their machine
is compromized. Extra security of https over http for them is barely a
blip.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]