[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora 11 fail because of Anaconda :(



Tom Lane wrote:
"Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" <wolfgang rupprecht+gnus200905 gmail com> writes:
Valent Turkovic <valent turkovic gmail com> writes:
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/index.php/archives/fedora-11-fail-because-of-anaconda/

The x86_64 Preview doesn't run here.

The PPC port has also gone largely untested, because it's impossible
to install it on Apple-based hardware (and how many of us own any other
kind of PPC?), thanks to this still-unaddressed bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492154

I don't have any warm fuzzies about how good F11 is going to be;
I'm afraid that anaconda's instability has blocked a lot of the
testing we'd normally get.

My post about "custom install" is just a similar instance, I have been using the 32 bit install heavily, but the only available machines for 64 bit testing require a custom install to slide the new release into a complex existing disk configuration.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen tmr com>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]