fedore love/issues

Maurizio Ungaro ungaro at jlab.org
Wed Sep 16 14:22:08 UTC 2009


Hi Paul,

wow that was fast.


> Yikes, that should not be happening.  Did you report a bug in
> Bugzilla, and attach your install.log and install.log.syslog in the
> bug?
I'm too busy trying to recover it right now. Also, I don't have a 
install.log. I did find a anaconda.syslog if that's what you're 
referring too.

> If disks are set up in a mirror, you're generally restricted to the
> size of the original disk.  If you set up*partitions*  in a mirror,
> though, you have more flexibility.
That was part of my complain ;-), I didn't set that up. It's by mirror 
it seems.

>> >  2) During installation, I wish I had the choice to make SE Linux
>> >  optional. As it was with previous releases.
>>      
> There's practically no reason for it now -- I run in enforcing mode
> all the time and I can't remember the last time I even noticed, let
> alone had a problem.  That doesn't mean there aren't SELinux policy
> improvements waiting to be made.  If you encounter a bug, file it,
> because we do send out policy updates quickly to fix them.
My point was more philosophical: I like to have control on whats 
installed/activated.... that's one of the Linux features I always liked.

> Things are generally handled with labels now, which are more flexible
> and don't rely on easily-broken device names like /dev/sda.  Also,
> there's a/dev/disk/* area you can use which I find is really helpful
> when I'm looking for a specific disk.  I don't have to know whether
> it's sda, sdb, sdf... which is good, especially now that 187-in-1
> media readers (or whatever it's up to today) are so popular!
Ok maybe I'm missing something. If I look at /dev/disk, I would expect 
that every disk or partition to be listed in every subdirectory there: 
by-id, by-label.
I'd also expect that every entry there is listed in fdisk -l. Am I wrong?

> Hm, that's interesting, because I have an external hard drive on a
> machine here that does sleep just like it should when unused.  So it's
> not a system wide problem.  Do you have any processes running which
> might be using the drive?
Ok that means it's me. I'm positive I don't have processes running on it 
though. I have to unplug it.


thanks for the quick, and knowledgeable, response.

best,
mauri

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090916/2b60be41/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list