Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] Re: livecd persistence

[Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>]

On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:49 -0500, Douglas McClendon wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:40 -0500, Douglas McClendon wrote:
> > 
> >> Lastly, wouldn't test2 require an approved feature?  
> > 
> > Thats the downside of the new feature process with all the approval and 
> > tracking and red tape. People start to think that they are not allowed
> > to work on cool stuff unless it has been approved....
> 
> To who are you referring?  I've already posted a (rough) implementation, 
> and asdas redhat com claims to have an alternate implementation (though 
> I doubt the claim that it was posted to livecd-list, as I don't remember 
> seeing it).

I was just referring to your question about an "approved feature", but
maybe I just misunderstood what you were trying to say.

> Clearly nobody, relating to the livecd persistence issue, thinks that 
> they aren't allowed to work on cool stuff.  We've already got 2 
> implementations, and it sounds like Jeremy may be starting a 3rd next week.
> 

Thats very good, we need cool stuff, the more the better...